<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does this generally mean when the Adaptec AAC BIOS says kernel stopped running?</title>
	<link>http://linux.adaptec.com/2007/10/08/what-does-this-generally-mean-when-the-adaptec-aac-bios-says-kernel-stopped-running/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://linux.adaptec.com/2007/10/08/what-does-this-generally-mean-when-the-adaptec-aac-bios-says-kernel-stopped-running/#comment-110</link>
		<author>Paul</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linux.adaptec.com/2007/10/08/what-does-this-generally-mean-when-the-adaptec-aac-bios-says-kernel-stopped-running/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>I have seen this on a ICP5085BL due to a bad drive!!! 

The drive was Seagate ST3250620NS

Two (of 4 drives in raid10) drive failures in one week....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen this on a ICP5085BL due to a bad drive!!! </p>
<p>The drive was Seagate ST3250620NS</p>
<p>Two (of 4 drives in raid10) drive failures in one week&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
